Skip to content

Editorial Standards

This page describes the editorial standards Finance Pulse applies when researching, publishing, reviewing, and correcting content. It also explains how readers can report an error.

Last updated June 2026 Editor Jenny B.
Four promises

Standards we apply to Finance Pulse content

These standards guide new work and substantive updates. Older articles are reviewed and improved as part of the site audit.

01

Cites primary sources

For rules, limits, rates, and consumer protections, we prioritize the agency, regulator, issuer, or original dataset responsible for the information.

02

Verifies material claims

Time-sensitive limits, deadlines, rates, fees, and tax figures should be checked against a current source before publication or substantive update.

03

Keeps editorial independence

Affiliate partners do not see articles before publish. Ratings reflect our research, not the commission rate.

04

Discloses how we get paid

Affiliate relationships are disclosed. Any sponsored material must be clearly labeled and kept separate from editorial scoring.

Our sources

Sources we prioritize

The appropriate source depends on the claim. Primary and authoritative sources are preferred, while reputable secondary sources may provide context when no primary dataset answers the question directly.

IRS

Tax forms, deduction rules, contribution limits, and filing deadlines.

SEC

Securities filings, registration records, enforcement information, and investor education.

FDIC

Deposit insurance, BankFind records, consumer guidance, and bank-failure information.

Federal Reserve

Federal funds data, FOMC materials, economic data, and monetary policy statements.

BLS

Wage data, Consumer Price Index releases, and employment statistics.

Census Bureau

Household income, demographic data, and homeownership statistics. Used for context on how Americans actually save and spend.

CFPB

Consumer protection rules, the complaint database, and product warnings. Used for credit card, loan, and debt-related guides.

Editorial process

Our six-step editorial workflow

This is the workflow used for new articles and substantial rewrites.

  1. 01

    Research

    The editor scopes the question, identifies relevant sources, and separates verified facts from assumptions or commentary.

  2. 02

    Draft

    The draft explains the reader's question in plain language and places source links near material rules, figures, and product claims.

  3. 03

    Source verification

    Material figures, deadlines, limits, and legal or regulatory claims are checked against the most appropriate available source.

  4. 04

    Edit

    Editor cuts jargon, tightens claims, checks the structure, and confirms the reader can act on the article. If the answer is not clear by the end, it gets rewritten.

  5. 05

    Publish

    Article goes live with author byline, publish date, and "last updated" stamp. Affiliate disclosures sit at the top, not buried at the bottom.

  6. 06

    Update

    Articles are revised when laws, contribution limits, rates, or product terms change. Time-sensitive pieces (tax limits, Fed rates, HYSA APYs, credit card offers) get more frequent passes.

Section 1: Conflicts of interest

There is a wall between the money and the article

↓ Money side

Reader clicks an affiliate link

Partner pays a commission at no cost to the reader.

Partner pays Finance Pulse

Supports hosting, research, editing, and site operations.

Operating costs

Hosting and editorial work funded by Finance Pulse, not by partners.

↓ Editor side

Editor picks the topic

From reader questions and primary-source releases, not partner asks.

Writer drafts from sources

Partners do not receive approval rights over editorial conclusions or scores.

Rating is the editor's call

If the product is bad, we say so. Commission does not change the verdict.

No paid guest posts. No sponsored content disguised as editorial. No pay-to-play "best of" lists. For the full breakdown, read our Disclaimer and Advertiser Disclosure.

Section 2: Updates and corrections

How we handle corrections

Editor’s note

When material

Silent rewrite

Avoided

Fix verified

As reviewed

Material corrections should receive an editor's note describing what changed and when. Minor spelling, formatting, and broken-link fixes may be made without a note. If you spot an error, tell us. We review correction reports and update verified errors as promptly as practical.

Found an error?

Help us review a possible error.

Send the URL, the relevant passage, and a supporting source. Material verified corrections receive an editor's note when appropriate.